Words matter: Stylistic writing strategies for racial health equity in academic medicine

Many racialized health inequities in the USA have been known for decades. However, academic medicine, individual clinicians, and larger healthcare systems have not yet supported action towards sufficient and meaningful solutions, as evidenced by the persistence of racialized health inequities over time. Recently, academic medicine is increasing efforts to unequivocally identify systemic racism as a public health crisis because it drives health inequity to racially minoritized groups. A health equity emphasis in clinical education, practice, and research differs from a disparities approach because it seeks to dismantle the systems of racism that create inequitable health outcomes in the first place. Therefore, medical education, practice, and research are slowly transitioning from a lens of health disparities to one of health equity. In order to support this transition, authors and journals must restructure the depiction of health inequities caused by racism. Based upon the principles of the social medicine pioneer, Dr. Rudolph Virchow, the knowledge conveyed by scientific and medical academic writing must clearly name the drivers of social disease — which is generalized to the American landscape of racialized health inequity for the purposes of this manuscript — in order to inform action capable of stopping socially mediated health inequity. Yet, the language and construction of health disparities literature perpetuates colorblind and aversive racism by stylistically omitting the driver of inequity quite frequently, which renders such knowledge unable to support action. In this article, three academicians across the spectrum of social justice education identify and classify common writing styles of health disparities research in order to demonstrate how a writing style of racial health equity better supports true progress towards equity. (author abstract)